Do You See What I See? Autism Service Animal Dream Falters

The digital age has brought with it a whole new world that brings with it a host of advantages.  I have enjoyed the ability to communicate almost instantaneously with various members of the family seemingly no matter where they might be.  It is commonplace for people to be carrying a cell phone, and this also means they are usually carrying a highly portable video/still camera capable of pictures ranging from 2 – 10 MegaPixels many capable of HD video.  This means that a moment can be shared as it happens with an almost limitless audience.  From the simple communication device of old it has now grown into the modern smartphone.  Excuse me just a moment, I need to answer a quick Tweet.

From the phone a picture can be quickly posted to a Facebook album, Tweeted out, or pushed to any number of photo sharing sites to be shared with the world.  Many a phone has the ability to run Skype and provide real-time video chat.  Videos may be captured and uploaded to YouTube and yet for months families have waited for Siberian Snow Babies’ Animals for Autism to post a single picture of the dogs in their Autism Service Dog Training Class to be graduating this Spring.  You know, the dogs to be trained using the funds from the Pepsi Refresh Everything grant that was applied for and received by Lea Kaydus, the founder of the Animals for Autism program.  The only pictures of the growing “Pepsi Pups” were actually rather sad.  The picture below links to the photo album.  There is speculation as to the actual breed of the dogs.  White Shepherd has been suggested a few times.

Do these look like dogs you would feel comfortable assisting your disabled child.

It would not be fair if I didn’t once again state that Lea Kaydus applied for the grant as an individual not as her “organization” and she is required to remain and individual until the end of the grant period.  It would have been nice to have her publicly state this instead of continuing to campaign using the name Animals for Autism.  And then once the grant was announced, Animals for Autism released a press release announcing THEY had been funded.  Not really all that transparent.

But back to the original thread of this post.  Communication with Animals for Autism though any form of written medium became all but non-existent.  Lea insisted that the only reliable form of communication would be through phone…her cell phone.  Which again makes me wonder…why, with that wonder of modern technology in her possession the majority of the time she was unable to capture a video of any of the dogs in training, or heck, even a picture of a training session.  That would have given the families an opportunity to see their pups and the trainers in action.  As far as I know, none of the families involved has even spoken with their trainer(s).  All communication has been with Lea Kaydus.

I see a lot of misdirection, smoke and mirrors and many parlor tricks.

Do you see what I see?

[Paws 4 Autism has setup a dedicated fund for the ten families directly affected by the Animals for Autism / Siberian Snow Babies / Pepsi Refresh Grant Scam. To donate to this fund please follow the Paws 4 Autism link here.]

[The domain AnimalsForAutism.com has been registered by a concerned family and will be used to point to verified Autism Service Dog sources.  Any of their sites will have a labrador has its primary picture.]

One Day at a Time: Autism Service Animal Dream Falters

Today was better than yesterday.  That is a small victory in the books.  At the moment I am happy for these small victories and am taking one day at a time.

Since April of 2011 I have watched as a small “organization” in Illinois elevated my families hopes of obtaining a autism service dog to stratospheric heights and then within just a few months sent it all crashing down.

Since officially withdrawing from their training program – I believe that we were the first family to join them in 2011 – I have sought answers to question and even to this day I have received very little.  There are several people who have stepped forward in an effort to help us get those answers and I would like to say thank you to them and those for which they work.  Without further ado…thank you for shedding some light on this story:

Mike Brooks, WICS ABC NewsChannel 20 Springfield for your segment
Chris Henry, Kitsap Sun for your story and Meegan Reid for the great photo.
Jesse Jones, KING 5 Seattle, for your hard work and the segment airing soon.
Better Business Bureau of Central Illinois
Office of the Attorney General of Illinois
Springfield Autism Resource Center
The Autism Program of Illinois

I hope that it will not end here but continue to burn bright and bring out the truth of it all.  For this to happen I believe that there will need to be a constant reminder for the families involved to have closure.  I wish I could say that I thought it stopped with the families mentioned in the various articles – I have a sinking fear that it extends beyond that even beyond the confines of our country into possibly Canada, New Zealand, and Australia.  Each person who has posted a comment on the Siberian Snow Babies’ Animals for Autism Facebook page inquiring about a possible service dog was given instructions to email for further information.  Below is our email inquiry to Lea Kaydus, founder of Siberian Snow Babies’ Animals for Autism.

Hello,

 My wife and I are searching for a service dog for our soon-to-be 8 year-old daughter, Faith.  A very quick background on her and why we are seeking a service dog.  Faith had a right-hemisphere stroke prior to birth.  She is diagnosed with Autism, mild cerebral palsy, Familial Mediterranean Fever Syndrome, Rapid Cycling Mood Disorder and several life-threatening food allergies.  The stroke also caused a disruption in her growth – the left side of her body is smaller than the right side.  Although not as extreme as some it has been systemwide to include bones and internal organs.  As a result she has had developmental delays and her fine motor skills and coordination are very poor which is only compounded by increased swelling in her extremities.  

 We are hoping to find her a dog which can help her become more independent and less fearful.  To help her mobility: provide assistance when she is having difficulty walking, retrieve items that she has dropped, possibly open doors, assist with getting dressed.  Emotionally: to interrupt self-harming behavior, stay with her during the night and alert us if she wanders, help her calm during “meltdowns” and ease both transitions and public places by providing support.  If it were possible for her dog to alert us in the event of an allergic reaction.

With all this being said; a service dog is desired over a therapy dog.  Our goal is to help make her more independent and less reliant on our constant presence.

 Would your program be able to assist with these items?  What is your wait list?  Do you have specific requirements?  What are the anticipated costs?  

 Thank you so much for your time and help.

This was answered the next morning with the following email which included an application to their program:

Thank you for your inquiry about our service animal program.  The basic requirements for our program are a diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder, be age 5+, and have a prescription from a physician stating the need for a service animal, none of which should be a problem for you.  I would be most honored to develop a training program for one of our animals to meet your daughter’s needs.  Some of the challenges you have presented are more time consuming than our usual requests from a training perspective, however, they are all attainable.  I will address each of your requests individually.

1 – Balance assistance with gait is a fairly common training challenge, yet unique to each individual.  Part of our application package is a request from you of a short video to help familiarize our team with your daughter’s needs.  A clip showing her walking and mobility challenges should be a part of that submission.

2 – Picking up dropped items – easily accomplished.

3 – Opening doors – easily accomplished.

4 – Assistance with dressing is a bit more challenging and depends on the specificity of the actual tasks.  Retrieving and passing on articles of clothing is quite doable, but I would like a clearer description of what it is you would expect of the animal.

5 – Interruption of self-injurious behaviors – easily accomplished through a combination of the service animal and ABA techniques, but I would like additional details about the specific behaviors we will be training to interrupt.

6 – Spending the night and wandering alert – easily accomplished.

7 – Calming meltdowns – easily accomplished through a combination of the service animal and ABA techniques.

8 – Allergic reaction alert – This concerns me the most.  There are two ways of training for this, and I will need to know what your daughter is allergic to.  At this point, I am assuming she has an anaphylactic reaction to whatever the allergen(s) may be.  The easiest (and safest) method of training for allergy alerts is to train the animal to alert in the presence or near proximity of the allergen.  Additional details will be necessary.

Training for an average autism service animal takes 12-18 months with 1000 to 1500 hours of active, hands-on time.  Most of these programs are actually completed close to the 12 month/1000 hour set-point.  With some of the advanced skills needed for your daughter, I feel the minimum hands-on time will be 1500 hours.  That is normally spread over an 18 month period, but if time is of the essence to you, the animal could be trained for longer daily periods, and still finish close to the 12 month mark. 

All of the animals in our program are generously donated by quality breeders who are our close, personal friends we have known since our “show dog days” many years ago.  All are from champion or grand champion AKC or UKC bloodlines and are of optimal health.  The average life span of the animal is 12-15 years, with most dogs ready to retire between 8 and 10 years of age.  At retirement, you can either retire him/her with you but no longer in service, or the animal can be returned to us to live out his or her retirement years.  There has been recent press regarding a gentleman whose animal was repossessed for what the agency considered just cause.  I will not comment personally, other than to say that when we transfer an animal to a family for service, we relinquish all rights to that animal and simply ask you to return it to us if it is no longer of service or you can no longer care for it. 

In addition to having donated puppies, we have also been blessed to have donated space in which to work with the animals, gracious volunteer puppy raisers, and some donations of food and other supplies.  We also have incredible trainers who work contractually for us at a rate of just $5 per hour.  They consider their discounted rates to be their gift to our families.  We even have a couple of junior trainers who are on the autism spectrum and working toward careers of their own in animal husbandry and training.  All of this takes place under the supervision of myself, and I am a Certified Master Trainer.  The actual cost to raise and train a service animal is in the $20,000+ range, but we are able to place our highly-trained service animals in the $5000 to $7500 range, and the pricing reflects the number of training hours required. 

I cannot make a final determination of cost without a completed application package, however.  There are many pointed questions in the application package, and each is extremely important for the development of the training program.  It is not a test, but the clearer and more detailed your responses are, the better we can map a course of action.  Once I have that in hand and can meet with our team, we can determine the necessary training time, and let you know the outcome.  Our general policy is that our families travel to central Illinois for the final phase of training, which is a week of intensive integration and proper handling techniques to use with your service animal.  If you case, I am thinking may be more appropriate for a trainer to come to you for that week.  Should that be decided, there will be travel fees associated in addition to the training program. 

At the present time, we do not have a waiting list, and we have puppies just entering the early “citizenship” phase of training.  However, the waiting list can and does tend to change from one day to the next.  I have attached a copy of our application package for you, and if you have any further questions, do not hesitate to ask.  You are also welcome to call me directly if you wish at 217-XXX-XXXX.  I spend much of my time with puppies and in meetings, so leave a message if necessary, and I will get back with you as soon as possible.  Thank you again for your inquiry, and I hope we can work together to enhance the quality of life for your little one.  

Sincerely,

~LM Kaydus, CMT, BSA, MAS
Founder, Animals for Autism
AKK National Rescue
Autism Mom 

And even more impressive was how quickly the organization’s board met and voted to approve our application; and how quickly we were matched with our 5-week-old pup.  And even though we had been cautioned because of the lack of trainer names listed on the web site and where they learned to train service dogs; we decided to proceed.  Hindsight is 20/20.  I can only hope that others will learn from our haste and make a more informed decision that might also include advice/counseling from a local autism resource center, discussion the organization with an autism resource center in their geographic area, advice/counseling from knowledgable dog trainers and verifying tax status, business status, and their compliance with regulations.

Consider reading a few of the following blog entries:

Autism Service Dog 101 by Shane Nurnburg of Autism Epicenter
Time to Light a Fire by living legend Lindserella
Hey Pepsi! by Katherine Stone of Stollerderby posted on Babble.com
Another Fleecing of the Autism Community by Liz Ditz of I Speak of Dreams

Just a little light reading to get your started.  Thank you for your patience.  More to follow in the near future.

When Integrity Meant Something to Corporate America

From the official application guidelines for the Pepsi Refresh Project: The Pepsi Refresh Project is an online grant program which makes available millions of dollars to be granted to projects which are intended to improve communities through an online, democratic voting process (“Grant Program”).

This program has such amazing potential providing 60 grants totaling $1,125,000 per grant period to help individuals improve their communities.  Its funded ideas have included the replacement of equipment for high school marching bands, building community playgrounds, the shipment of care packs to deployed soldiers, and the funding of animal shelters and rescues.  So how does the magic begin?

A person, or organization (for-profit or non-profit) submits their idea via the online application.  The idea is then put up to a public vote on the Grant Program website.  The top ten ideas receiving votes then go up for final certification prior to funding.  Sounds simple enough.  There are stories that the competition for these grants, especially during the last stages of voting, can get quite cutthroat.  Sadly, I think that sometimes it can bring out the worst in people while attempting to promote good.

The “founder” of Siberian Snow Babies’ Animals for Autism, Lea Kaydus, applied for a grant during the May voting period.  She solicited support from everyone and anyone she thought might be able to help her gain the grant, including partnering with other organizations competing for grants.  In her Animals for Autism Facebook page she sought support from her Facebook fans.  Her press release dated May 1, 2011 titled Animals for Autism to Place 10 Autism Service Dogs Free of Charge? does very clearly identifies her organization as the grant requester.  The posts on the Facebook page were the same.  If you had asked the families participating in her service dog training program who would be the grant recipient I am fairly certain the response would have been Animals for Autism, and not Lea Kaydus.  So in this way we all felt very misled.  I suppose things like this happen and I should not be surprised.  So I am going to just ignore this for now.  I would like to focus on other things.

A few days ago I decided to pose a few questions to Lea Kaydus on her organization’s Facebook wall.  Here is my post:

Hello Animals for Autism. I was wondering why are you still listing your group as a NON-PROFIT organization when you are not? I know that we were not the only ones waiting as you told us the paperwork was filed. 

Why are you posting pictures on the Animals for Autism Facebook page of puppies that are clearly listed for sale on PuppyFind? I would think that it would be better to post pictures of service dog training, since that is what you do (after all, you don’t just breed puppies and sell them) 

I would love to know the thinking behind it but am sure my post will go the way of many others like it on your wall, unanswered.

And the reply coupled with a picture of yet another group of puppies playing.

 

Animals for Autism

Because I applied for a grant as an individual, I am required to remain an individual until the end of the grant period. Fortunately, this detail was discovered before the application was processed with the correct user fee. However, the IRS allows Form 1023 to remain unfiled as long as an organization has gross receipts in each taxable year of not more than $5,000. Since Animals for Autism’s receipts are far less than $5,000, the NFP can accept contributions without filing until the end of the grant period. It is allowable to file the form within 27 months after the end of the month in which you were legally formed. I did, however, overlook a $15 required state fee for accepting donations on behalf of our families, and that was rectified several months ago – along with a late fee. As far as pictures are concerned, there are thousands of beautiful puppies out there, most of whom do not qualify to enter into a service animal training program. Twila is just one example, as she’s entirely too shy. However, she is still quite adorable, and most people tell me they enjoy just seeing the pictures, so I share them here. Profits from ineligible puppies like Twila are donated to the Animals for Autism program. =)
Ms. Kaydus, there are people who enjoy seeing pictures of cute little puppies (even puppies for sale) but on your Animals for Autism Facebook page and (when it was active) your Siberian Snow Babies’ Animals for Autism web site the people who are YOUR training program – the members of your Spring ’11 Autism Service Animal Training Class – really want to see you post pictures of their dogs working in a training setting.  To see them out around town wearing their Service Dog In Training vests becoming accustomed to that which many of us still dread dealing with.  They want to see them growing and advancing.  While the puppies may be cute; they are irrelevant.  It can be likened to the realtor showing you a Barbie Dream House, pointing out all the wonderful accessories and additions when you just want to see your new house.
This is from the IRS website regarding recognition of Tax Exemption which I believe is where Ms. Kaydus has pulled the numbers in her response from.  Wish I were a tax lawyer and understood the wording a little better.  Is there anyone out there who does?  I would love to hear from you.
Some of the families have been told that the Pepsi Pups are currently in emergency shelters because you have not received the entire $50,000 grant from Pepsi.  When you modified the funding agreement, and your detailed line item budget as required by Global Giving did you not also include a line item for food and medical supplies?  The families were informed by both Dennis Dowd and Terri Maini of the Pepsi Refresh Project that their funds provided automatic feeding systems, crates, leashes, harnesses, collars (wonder why none of the dogs wear collars or name tags) as well as building upgrades.  When you consider that you normally already have all of that lined up through donations prior to offering up the service animal and are only requiring the recipient to cover training costs at roughly $5/hour I would think that should have been a priority.
Ms. Kaydus has not upheld her portion of the many verbal contracts in which she has entered.  She has repeatedly and continuously ignored requests for information from those in her service program.  She has repeatedly ignored requests for information from the Better Business Bureau, and the Attorney General of Illinois.  Ms. Kaydus told the Attorney General that the families knew funds were nonrefundable and yet her application includes a refund policy.  Where is the integrity in your organization Ms. Kaydus?  Why have those in your local area not heard of the service you offer?
One last thought: there were numerous families receiving upwards of 30 Power Vote codes each day during the month of May from Ms. Kaydus.  Where did all these codes come from?  Did you truly collect them and distribute them?  Was that where the money from the families was spent?  Or were you part of the Mister Magic fiasco as well…

Even a Great Cause May Be Warped (originally posted on Dogs with a Cause)

[Editorial note: This post has been copied in its entirety from Dogs with a Cause (AnimalsForAutism.com)  I know, it says it is from Animals for Autism.  When we first became marked as "troublemakers by Lea Kaydus and Siberian Snow Babies' Animals for Autism I registered the domain name in an effort to possibly redirect traffic to a more reliable source]

There are times when you just have to admit that someone you had counted on to do the right thing decided that there was something else that was more important.  Somehow, somewhere, the trust that you had placed in them was deemed to be less important than _________ [and this is where it becomes a bit of a guessing game and you have to fill in the blank].

There were at least 13 families that put their trust in an organization called Animals for Autism our of Tallula, IL.  They were beyond ecstatic when they heard there was the possibility of getting their autistic child an autism service dog for the unheard of cost of $5000.  I know, it sounds like an awful lot for a dog.  In reality, it is nowhere near the actual cost when you take everything into account.  To help you see this I will give you a few of the statistics.

Roughly 1 in 40 dogs has the proper temperament and intelligence to become a service dog.  Of those that do pass the screening, only 1/2 of them are able to complete the training and go onto a career as a service animal.  With that being said, to guarantee a graduate you would screen 160 dogs and begin training 4.  And there are all the costs of taking care of those animals over the course of the 12 – 18 months of training.  Oh, but we must not forget we want the dogs properly socialized so they should probably be with a puppy raiser just learning how to be polite around people and other animals before they begin their training.  We should do that for 6 – 12 months.  Then we can begin advanced obedience classes and specific task training.  A lot of work, a lot of time, and a lot of money goes into training a service dog.  It can cost between $13,000 – 20,000 to provide one service animal.  I certainly did not realize this before.  So you see, that $5000 is a miracle.  So how do they do it?

According to their web site Animals for Autism has a vast network of donors, supporters, and volunteers at their disposal.  The dogs are donated from various breeders they know from their prior time in the show ring.  Supplies such as leashes, harnesses, vests, collars, and even a crate are donated to assist them in keeping the costs down.  Funds for all medical care to include vaccinations, spay/neuter, microchipping and well checks are procured prior to beginning the training program.  Food and other incidentals are brought in as donations, either free or at reduced cost.  Foster care for the puppies socialization is secured prior to the program starting.  All that is needed is money to pay the trainers and soon there will be a highly trained service dog ready to head out and do great things.  And have I mentioned that the trainers have agreed to work at the highly reduced rate of $5/hr [they consider it their gift to the families who need the puppies].  So that is how it is done on paper.

With all that being said and you have run a promotion to provide one (1) autism service dog free of charge to a family in honor of Autism Awareness Month I would think that all funding for that animal should be in place prior to making that offer public.  Then you begin soliciting for applications for this  free service animal.  You post on autism boards, various autism resource web sites, maybe even put out a press release.  At some point you realize that this appears to be a huge market since you have received over 1,000 applications with more arriving daily.  Now maybe you are thinking, I would love to be able to help more families.  I know, Pepsi has their Refresh Everything Project and I can apply for a $50,000 grant.  If I can get that grant I can help 10 families since it only costs me about $5000 to train a service dog.  That would be 400 hours of Basic Obedience, 400 hours of Advanced obedience and 200 hours of Stay/Wander Halting.  [Going back to the math, statistics would say that in order to supply 10 trained service dogs you would need to screen upwards of 400 dogs and train at least 20.]  I am really glad all that is needed is money to cover the salary of the trainers since that is already $5,000 in just their cost.  Really glad that all the other costs of having a dog has been covered because of the foresight to not begin training a dog until all other expenses have been met.  Otherwise, it could be very bad.

What if that wasn’t the case?  What if you had become one of the ten ideas for the month that was chosen for funding but you were told that you could not use that $50,000 for trainer’s salaries.  You had to use it for something tangible, something easier to monitor.  Let’s just say that Pepsi through their grant administrator, Global Giving, told you that you had to use the money for supplies, or building upgrades.  But you didn’t really need funding for that – just trainer’s fees.  Now, where would you be?  You have all these families and autistic children counting on you to deliver the FREE autism service dogs but you can’t just turn your back on a $50,000 grant.  After all, maybe there are things that could be purchased to help.  Maybe, even get ahead for the next group you will train.  Then comes the question, who will cover the training fees for these 10 additional FREE autism service animals?  Looks like you will either have to tell those families that you cannot provide the animals, or they will have to pay the fees themselves, or maybe, you will have to cover the costs associated with the training from your own money.  Not the best of choices.  Up to this point it has been assumed that all is above board and legitimacy exists.  If it didn’t then Pepsi would not have allowed you to receive this $50,000 grant.  After all, who goes around handing out that much money to just anybody.  [If you do know of someone who does, please email us their info here so that we can be put in contact with them]  Here you are trying to do this wonderful thing for these autistic children and you have hit a major stumbling block.  What to do??

Now let’s take a little trip using our imagination.  Imagine that you are the parent of an autistic child that has been accepted into this godsend of a program.  You saw the $5,000 price tag and although it was more than you had available you say to yourself “I can raise that much money.  We have some money saved up.”  The pictures of the puppies on the web site were just so cute and they look so ready to have a permanent home.  You begin looking for donors to help you raise the money.  You have found some willing to help if the program you are working with is a certified 501c(3) and their support will be tax deductible.  Sounds great since you saw on their Facebook page that they were a non-profit and when you had asked you were told that the IRS was in the final phase of non-profit determination.  You were a little concerned when the organization wouldn’t give you their Tax-ID number to give to your potential donors, but eventually you were able to get it.  People have asked to see pictures of your puppy.  They want to see the puppy doing service dog training sort of stuff.  They want to get that warm, fuzzy feeling about their donation and their work on your behalf.  Too bad all that you received was a low resolution digital photo that becomes severely pixelated (fuzzy) when it is enlarged even up to a 3″x5″ size.  So you ask for a better quality picture, and more…are there more for me to show people?  And you are told no.  Not right now, and I’m afraid we are just really busy at the moment – you know we are trying to win a $50,000 grant from Pepsi that might possibly cover all your training fees.  We know you are busy with your own individual fundraising but would you be willing to help us?  There is a chance it will benefit you in the end.  Of course!  How could you turn this down?  You ask friends, family, and even complete strangers to help.  You recommend the organization – they are doing great things for autistic children.  Still, you don’t receive any new pictures, or real training updates.  Now that you are thinking about it, you haven’t actually even talked to your pup’s trainers.

Remember that Tax ID you were given a while back; one of your donors has called to let you know that it was invalid.  Not only was in not in non-profit status, it doesn’t belong to the organization that gave it to you.  Maybe there was just a transposition of numbers.  Had to have been a simple mistake.  So you figure you will look it up on the IRS database, but you can only search by name there.  You type in “Animals for Autism” and get no items returned.  Hmmm, maybe I should search under “Siberian Snow Babies” instead.  Nope.  Nothing.  How about “Siberian Snowbabies” then?  Again, nothing.  Frustrated with the search you  pick up the phone and call the local IRS office for help.  Their agent only makes that sinking feeling in your stomach worse when you hear “I’m sorry, I cannot find anything under any of those names.  The Tax ID you asked about does not belong to any of the organizations you mentioned.  Yes, the database is updated almost instantaneously.  It usually only takes about 2 weeks for the whole process to be complete once the application is submitted online.”

You want to feel right about something so you pull up the picture of your pup – that always makes you feel better.  Knowing that little puppy will make such a huge impact on your child in the near future.  Really cool coincidence – the pup shares your birthday.  Maybe putting the picture in the header of your request for help can help win over a few people.  Wait, why does this picture say that it was taken in 2007?  You know your pup was born in 2011.  There it is, embedded in the photo’s exif data: the camera brand and model, exposure settings, flash settings, date taken.  There’s that feeling coming back with a fury like no other.  Looks like the only recent pictures on the organizations web site are the ones they have posted of their “Puppies for Sale”.  All the others seem to be from several years back, and all are taken with the same brand and model camera.  How are you feeling about your choice now??

The face behind Animals for Autism

So why is it that so many people are so enamored with this organization.  So much so, that they can do no wrong.  Please…just think about it.  And also, read the other blog posts that are being posted about this organization and its founder, Lea Kaydus. [She also goes by the names Millie, LM, and utilizes the last names Kaydus and Denton]

Thank you for reading this blog post, I know it got a bit long.  Please share.

 

Autism Service Animals for All or Something Like That

I am not angry at Pepsi or Global Giving.  I understand that as business entities neither of you have done anything illegal and that the administration of the grants disbursed by your Pepsi Refresh Everything Project has been done according to the predetermined plan.  I am disappointed in both of you because I feel you allowed someone to manipulate your program to gain the materials and equipment to increase the number of puppies they sell online; all of this done in the name of helping autistic children.  And when the concerns were brought to your attention they were ignored.  It was as if your program were infallible.  Does that really hold true to the Mission, Vision and Guiding Principles of your companies?

OK, so you apply for a grant from Pepsi as an individual (although I would venture to say that you had to do so because your “organization” is not legally a legitimate organization) Then on your Facebook page where you’ve asked the rest of the world to Vote for your idea at Pepsi Refresh – why do you make it sound like “Animals for Autism” has applied. You never once said “The founder of Animals for Autism, Lea Kaydus, has applied for a grant from the Pepsi…”

And then, why did you issue press releases as “Animals for Autism” stating that you had received your Pepsi grant and would be using the grant to place free autism service animals? Especially since you already knew that this had changed because Global Giving wanted something more tangible to be able to measure your progress toward goal completion.  Why did you not once mention this to those supporting you.

Where did your entire support system go? You know, the volunteers and donors who supply you with vaccinations and microchipping, puppy foster parents, supplies like food, leashes, collars, harnesses and dens. That is how you claim to only need the training fees to be covered by the applicant families. And if you knew this was not the case this time, why did you not include pet food, those other essential supplies and registration with local authorities for the pups, maybe even collars with name tags on them to allow you to visually differentiate the pups? Instead you chose automatic feeding systems (10 of them) so that the pups could be automatically fed in their kennels. Which family needs a pup trained to get its food from an automatic feeding system? Why would it be needed initially if the pups are with the foster puppy raisers?  Almost sounds like you were wanting to use this almost as an assembly line to get your pups out there in quantity.  How did your budget of $25,000 disappear so fast.

Did you spend it all on the construction of the “new facility”? From the outside it appears to be an add-on to the larger steel barn. It almost looks like your standard RV garage. I’m almost positive as prior owners of your own trenching and excavating company, you probably still have some contacts in the field. Why would you say that you “purchased” your new property when you are merely relocating your facility to land owned by your husband’s family.  Why do you respond to every new person who posts on your Facebook wall asking how to acquire a service animal with “Feel free to email *********.yahoo.com for application information.” but refuse to reply to the families currently in your program.  Why do you insist on deleting legitimate questions posted on your wall?

Why would you not leave a forwarding address with the Post Office? It wouldn’t have anything to do with the fact that you have received requests for explanations from the Attorney General, the Better Business Bureau, Navy Legal, and I am sure others at your current address. How are your clients supposed to be able to find/contact you? You tell everyone who asks for information on your Facebook page to email you and yet claim to not have internet access for extended periods of time at frequent intervals. How did your daughter update her Facebook profile so often while you did not have internet access? Who posted the ads on PuppyFind.com for the Siberian Puppies on your behalf? What about the eBay auction that seems to be continuously renewed?

Recently Animals for Autism founder, Lea Kaydus, was asked by a reporter from WICS – Springfield for information pertaining to the concerns with her program.  [She declined an on-camera interview with the explanation that it was not allowed by Pepsi]  She informed the reporter that all was well with the program and that the puppies would be delivered on time as promised.  That is very contradictory to the information received by one of the families in the program.  This family was told that the puppies were in emergency shelters since she did not have the money to feed them.  She also told another person who had called inquiring about a service dog training program that her program was on hold due to lack of funds, the puppies were in emergency shelters and had not yet begun training and that it would be 18 months after she was able to get them back before they would be able to be delivered.  So which is it?  You claim on your Facebook page that all is well, why was there no mention of emergency shelters and lack of funds for food?

Lots of questions and very few good answers.

Pepsi, Autism Service Animals, and Shattered Dreams pt 3

[Editorial note: My other posts talk of ten families that were part of the Animals for Autism program.  This is mostly true - there were ten families that became part of the program sponsored by the Pepsi Refresh Everything project but there were others caught up in this]

Thirteen families entered into a program with high hopes, high energy and expectations of a better life on the other side.  Autism Service Animals can bring that to a family.

Yes, I said thirteen.

We should not forget the first that brought all of our attention to Siberian Snow Babies’ Animals for Autism.  The family that was to receive a free service dog in honor of Autism Awareness Month,were the Johnson’s.  After all, if we had not found that press release we might have missed all this fun.  They have not had any real contact with Lea Kaydus or any other trainer from Animals for Autism.  This pup was the one Animals for Autism had planned from the get-go to donate free-of-charge.  He had been donated to the training program and all expenses should have already been taken into account, even the cost of paying the trainers.  Which makes me wonder – so what has happened to James?

Then shortly after the announcement of the placements to be funded by the Pepsi Refresh Everything Program, our group was joined by the DiRedo family.  Even though their training costs were not covered by the Pepsi grant their pup, Kino, was to be trained alongside all the others.  Whatever happened to Kino?

And then one last family, with funding in place from a generous benefactor.  The requirements were that it would only be given to a program which was a 501c(3) and must be used prior to the end of 2011.  Animals for Autism claimed to be a non-profit on their Facebook page.  People were told time after time from June onward that the all paperwork had been submitted to the IRS and AFA was simply awaiting their final determination.  When the elusive tax ID number was received it was discovered that it had never applied for non-profit status AND that it did not belong to Animals for Autism or Siberian Snow Babies.  The Spencer family not only wasted a lot of time waiting for the “right” dog to be found and the tax ID number in order to utilize there funding; the family is now in the position that they no longer have the funding.  This could have been utilized somewhere else had they been told the truth.

So what happens now?  To be honest, I am not really sure.  I wish there was an answer that I felt truly satisfied all aspects.  What value do you place on the time that families spent waiting because they believed in the organization providing the excuses.  Those excuses were bolstered by the insistence of the grant program that all was well – that all was on schedule and nobody should be worried.  What value do you assign to this?  Global Giving, would it be acceptable to have treated Ms. Indra K. Nooyi in the same manner that you have treated the families who called with concerns?  Were these concerns forwarded to anyone in the leadership.  Have you read the PepsiCo Values and Philosophy?  Maybe they don’t apply to you but I would think that Pepsi would be looking at your actions since their Values and Philosophy are the foundation for every business decision they make which would include your oversight of their Refresh Everything Project.

Taken from the Pepsi Co website here:

Pepsi Co Values and Philosophy

Our Values & Philosophy are a reflection of the socially and environmentally responsible company we aspire to be. They are the foundation for every business decision we make.

Pepsi Co Commitment

We are committed to delivering sustained growth through empowered people acting responsibly and building trust.

 

What it Means

Responsibility and Trust form the foundation for healthy growth. We hold ourselves both personally and corporately accountable for everything we do. We must earn the confidence others place in us as individuals and as a company. By acting as good stewards of the resources entrusted to us, we strengthen that trust by walking the talk and following through on our commitment to succeeding together.

Pepsi Co Guiding Principles

We uphold our commitment with six guiding principles. [3 of the 6 shown]

We must always strive to:

1.  Care for our customers, our consumers and the world we live in. 
We are driven by the intense, competitive spirit of the marketplace, but we direct this spirit toward solutions that benefit both our company and our constituents. Our success depends on a thorough understanding of our customers, consumers and communities. To foster this spirit of generosity, we go the extra mile to show we care.

3.  Speak with truth and candor. 
We tell the whole story, not just what’s convenient to our individual goals. In addition to being clear, honest and accurate, we are responsible for ensuring our communications are understood.

6.  Respect others and succeed together. 
Our mutual success depends on mutual respect, inside and outside the company. It requires people who are capable of working together as part of a team or informal collaboration. While our company is built on individual excellence, we also recognize the importance and value of teamwork in turning our goals into accomplishments.

All I am asking is that you hold to your values as a company, as individuals, and honor your commitment.  Show the world that even though you may come out with a bit of a black eye you will do so with integrity.

Pepsi, Autism Service Animals, and Shattered Dreams pt. 2

[Editorial note: I apologize for covering items mentioned in the previous post(s) but there is just so much that has happened and I do want to paint a complete picture.  There really is a wealth of information and to put it all in one post is overwhelming.]

Parents Raising Concerns Over Local Autism Group <- News Channel 20 story

Our life since withdrawing from the Siberian Snow Babies’ Animals for Autism program has been quite the roller coaster.  It was hard enough to admit to ourselves that maybe, just maybe, we had made a mistake in the organization we had chosen to provide our Autism Service Dog.  After all, the “founder” of the organization had a child on the spectrum.  She knew our trials and tribulations, at least to some extent after all, no two autistic children are identical.  Please read my previous post, if you have not already, for some more background.

We wanted to believe that it all was true, that autism service animals could be provided for a minimal cost even with the extensive training that would be required.  This organization claimed that their access to resources and volunteers would allow them to cover most of the costs associated with providing Autism Service Animals.  ”The only costs associated with acquiring one of our animals are for the the training required to prepare them for a career as service animals.  In addition, our trainers have greatly reduced their normal fees to make the dream of owning an Autism Service Animal a reality for more families than ever before.”

It was a dream.  A dream shared by many a special needs family.  We dream of the freedom, of the stability, that could be provided by a well-trained autism service dog.  Many do not believe that dream is even close to a possibility due to the high costs associated with the acquisition.  The promise of only needing to pay for training costs at a highly reduced rate is very appealing.  Animals for Autism promised this.  A service dog for on average $5000.00 which could be paid over a period of one year while your dog was being carefully trained under the watchful eye of a trainer who would be in continuous communication with the family.  Then mention that this organization is planning on giving away an Autism Service Dog in honor of Autism Awareness Month.  That certainly garners attention.

The fees were kept lower by screening and testing donated AKC and UKC puppies.  By securing funding for all veterinary expenses, including spay/neutering, immunizations and microchipping, prior to placement.  Securing “foster care” for the animals’ socialization (also known as puppy raisers) prior to placement.  Providing a consistent diet of nutritionally balanced, high-quality food for the animal for the duration of the program (Lea was very specific that she utilized Purina products).  Animals for Autism would secure donated equipment – tethers, leashes, collars and harnesses as well as a crate or “den” for the animal and then provide a “working vest” and proper credentials, documentation and all health records at time of placement.

Just recently, a reporter, Mike Brooks, from an ABC affiliate in Springfield, Illinois went to try and get some information and maybe some answers.  Ms. Kaydus told Mr. Brooks that the dogs were with donor families learning the basics, and that they only come to her for training sessions.  She said that everything was on schedule and going fine.  When he asked to see the dogs she said that it would not be possible.  This was the story the news reporter was given.  An “anonymous” person called to “inquire” about a service dog and was told that they have the service dog training program on hold until Pepsi gives them the rest of the money.  Pepsi has only given them $25,000 and is holding off on the rest because people are lying about them and saying that there are no dogs.  Due to this, they can’t afford to even feed the dogs right now and so they are in emergency shelters waiting.  They have not yet begun training and they cannot get the dogs out until they get the rest of the money from Pepsi.  Are you hearing this Pepsi (and Global Giving)?  Once they get them back it will take at least 18 months to train.  Anybody is welcome to come out to visit the dogs at the shelter in the meantime.  It was so bad that they didn’t have a Christmas.  Please remember that since May they have received over $5,000 from the families participating in their program AND $25,000 from Pepsi through Global Giving.  This does not even include donations made directly to them on behalf of the families in the program since that has never been fully disclosed.  If you figure that a 40 pound bag of Purina dog food can be purchased for about $30 a bag…why is it that they could not feed the animals?  Especially, if the animals are actually out in their “foster homes” learning the basics.  I believe that the volunteer puppy raisers were donating their time and providing for the puppies during that stage.

Each family seems to be given a version of the story most suitably tailored for them.  How much of what we have been told is true and how much is false?  I cannot even begin to guess.  I do know that I would not wish this upon any family, let alone a family with a child on the autism spectrum.  A child that has been told since May that soon they would have their very own puppy, who would be able to be there for them, no matter where.  A puppy with a name and a face that was apparently a dream too good to be true.

Through this experience I have met and become friends with a group of families I would not have met otherwise.  For that I am grateful.  I am very bitter that you hurt my family.  I am upset that I was not able to stop that from happening.  I am angry that so many refuse to even see it as a problem.  How would you feel had it happened to you?

Pepsi, Autism Service Animals, and Shattered Dreams

{Editorial note: I initially planned to link to the various pages of the Animals for Autism website but it has been pulled from the web for some unknown reason. Instead I will post screenshots of their website.]

In April of 2011 my wife and I decided it was time to take the plunge and actively seek a service dog for our daughter.  We had actually been searching for a service dog trainer/training organization for a while on and off for several months.  Most of the organizations we came across required a substantial (we are talking $15,000 – $20,000) amount of fundraising prior to being placed onto a waiting list to be matched with an animal.  That amount just seemed so daunting.  And then we stumbled upon what appeared to be a godsend.  There was this organization in Tallula, Illinois that was placing, free of charge, a highly-trained Autism Service Dog with a child or adult in need in recognition of Autism Awareness Month and World Autism Awareness Day.  We were informed that they were completing certification as a 501c nonprofit and that all donations made during the year would be tax deductible for our donors.  When we went to the website for Siberian Snow Babies’ Animals for Autism (http://siberiansnowbabies.com) we were surprised by how much less their final costs were compared to the others.  Their website stated “By privately funding all of the medical care, various incidentals, foster care and all of the animal’s other expenses, we are able to provide our Autism Service Dogs for as little as $5000.” (See following picture)
Training Fees and Funding pageThis was nothing short of a miracle for us – we knew we could do this!  We decided to skip applying for the free service dog, and begin their normal program.  Our application was submitted and much to our delight was accepted.  We were informed that since we were asking for our pup to also be trained to alert upon detection of peanut that we would need to pay a bit more than the normal $5000 but that we would be given a 10% military discount.  We were ecstatic.  Two weeks later our daughter was “matched” with a beautiful Isabella White Siberian Husky.  A week after we were matched their computer was invaded by a computer virus and they were required to purchase all new computer systems and reinstall all their photo and media programs.  They were unable to provide any updates or photos.

Beginning May 1, 2011 Animals for Autism began a campaign for a Pepsi Refresh Everything Grant in the amount of $50,000.  This grant would allow them to place TEN service dogs free of charge.  How amazing would that be.  Now this was definitely something we would/could and did support.  Our family, like many of the other “fan families” recruited friends, family members and anyone else we could wrangle into our corral.  We received daily contact with Lea Kaydus, founder of Animals for Autism, with Pepsi Power Vote codes to vote on their behalf.  And we did it, we accomplished our goal and Animals for Autism made it into the top 10 and became one of the funded programs.  We (those who began a training program despite not being selected for their Go Blue pup) were offered the opportunity to be part of the Pepsi Refresh Everything grant award, and accepted this opportunity – at this point almost $3000 had been paid to Animals for Autism on our behalf.  The miracle continues.  And yet, there still have not been any updates on our pup’s training progress, no contact with our trainer, no new pictures and our requests for assistance with our own fundraising was met with “we are too busy working on the Pepsi grant at the moment, maybe later.”

While working with the pictures we had received of our pup we noticed that they had been taken back in May of 2007.  All of our pictures had date stamps from 2007 – a red flag pops up and begins to wave.  So I became curious and began to check the other pictures on the site.  All were taken with the same camera and so many of them were two years old or older.  Now one could assume that the camera was just set wrong, since we knew that our pup was born on March 7, 2011 and not May, 2007 but the dates of the pictures on the site ranged from 2007 to 2011.  The 2011 pictures were of the brand new litter with pups up for sale.

Did I mention that 11 pups from two consecutive litters were placed into the training program for 11 families.  I should mention at this point that the reason service dogs are so expensive is the washout rate.  Here is a basic breakdown – one out of forty dogs has the proper temperament to become a service dog and half of those that begin training are unable to successfully complete the training.  And yet all 11 of these were all but guaranteed to be successful as service dogs – another red flag begins to wave.

We wanted to reassure ourselves that we had made the right decision with this company and so we contacted the Springfield Autism Resource Center (SPARC) which is just down the road from Tallula.  After all, Lea Kaydus had listed herself as active in the autism community and as Acting Director of Finance at SPARC.  Surely they would be able to calm our fears.

LinkedIn profileUnfortunately, none of the people we spoke with knew of Lea Kaydus or Animals for Autism.  They were unaware that there was an organization in their local area training and providing autism service animals – red flag.  How could this be??  They suggested that we contact the Autism Program of Illinois (TAP-IL).  We did this and received the same answer – this really was not helping calm our fears – yet another red flag.  We were finding ads online at various sites (PuppyFind.com and this one in Pakistan for one of the named Pepsi Pups)  Do I even need to say that this was a red flag?  At this point nothing felt right and the people we hoped would be able to alleviate our worries only caused more.  I would also like to have it noted that none of their animals are registered in the county in which they are currently residing, nor the one they previously resided.  They are not licensed by the State of Illinois as a business entity, nor a kennel.  They have never applied for 501c status with the Internal Revenue Service and the tax ID number that they gave to us did not belong to them.

I have spoken to many people.  I have made contact with the Internal Revenue Service, the State Department of Illinois, the Illinois Attorney General, the Illinois Department of Agriculture, the Better Business Bureau of Central Illinois, Springfield Autism Resource Center, The Autism Program of Illinois, Members of Sangamon and Menard Country Animal Control, my Naval Legal Services Office (AFA ignored their letter for information), program managers for the Pepsi Refresh Everything Project and all with very little to show for it.

To this date, Animals for Autism ignores the requests for information, updates from those in its program.  They respond to those inquiring as to how to get their own service animal with a simple – email for info.  I am flabbergasted.  I do not know how to respond but I feel that I must do something, say something, to prevent this from happening to anyone else.

Pepsi, I am sad.  You have lent credibility to this organization by your association.  I realize that the $50,000 you gave to them through Global Giving means very little to you but it did to us.  And the people you have in charge of your Refresh Everything Project have brushed our concerns aside, treating us as mere annoyances.  I wish I could get your attention, and truly get your help but I have to say that I doubt it will ever happen.  I had faith in the good of Refresh Everything but am beginning to think that it is nothing more than a tax write-off for you and a popularity contest for others.  While it has the potential to bring out good in people, and improve the world it seems to have also brought out an awful lot of deceit.  If you would like to know the people I have spoken with a simple email to me will evoke that response unless I receive that email from either Terri or Dennis.  In which case, I really am tired.  Global Giving has told one of the other families involved that my family (really that means my wife and I) are just troublemakers and that we should not be associated with.  Really??  Please walk through along the path I took to reach this point and tell me that you would be free of questions.  A bad case of Pepsi Autism Service Animals can really change your perspective of things.

What I really meant to do here was to introduce a very well-written post by another member of the Pepsi Pup fiasco and ask you to read her post but I got long-winded.  Please read the post by Ashley.  Pass it along to your friends to read.  Tweet about it.  Please don’t let this happen to anyone you know.

 


Why They Wear Dolphins

The following article is reprinted from the September 1967 issue of ALL HANDS Magazine.

 

WHY DO NAVYMEN volunteer for the Submarine Service?

What makes a sailor willingly submit himself to the rigors of the confining and often uncomfortable life of a submariner? The men of the U. S. underseas fleet claim they put in longer hours, are separated more from their families, must perform more diversified tasks and take greater risks than their surface counterparts. They live in an atmosphere where there is not enough water for daily showers at sea, where sleeping quarters are sparse and overcrowded, and where daily living can be rigorous as well as demanding.

Yet each year thousands of Navymen – seamen apprentices and veteran salts alike – volunteer for submarine duty. What’s more, those who volunteer seldom change their minds. The dropout rate is practically nil. Why?

 

 Here are the opinions of men in Submarine Flotilla One. It is a sampling of some 35 crewmembers from the following submarines:USS Bream (AGSS 243), Baya (AGSS 318), Caiman (SS 323), Diodon (SS 349), Razorback (SS 394), Redfish (AGSS 395), and Salmon (SS 573).

Most of the men who took part in the survey decided upon the Submarine Service after studying all the Navy’s programs. More often than not their initial interest was sparked by friends who had served in – or were at the time serving in – submarines.

 BUT WHAT brought about the ultimate decision?

Most gave more than one reason. Some were lured by the call of adventure, and the opportunities available to seek greater challenges and to tackle more responsibility. Others sought a more rounded career.

For 20 per cent, the idea of being part of an organization so well endowed with prestige, esprit de corps, and high morale was appealing. That image is the result, they say, of the need for teamwork and close-living compatibility, coupled with the reputation built through the deeds of their WW II predecessors.

And it is significant to note that nearly 46 per cent were attracted by the higher pay afforded submariners, as well as for some of the foregoing reasons. That extra pay, it goes without saying, was a motivating factor. What with life the way it is aboard a submarine, how does one adjust?

 The overwhelming reply was that submariners must first learn to adjust to their unusual environment, then do their best to get along with their shipmates. Many indicated that the problem of adjustment is an individual one.

Keeping active is important, according to one underseaman. He claims that if a man earnestly tries to contribute to the over-all effectiveness and betterment of the ship, he can forget his own discomforts.

 

 “Experience in human relations is helpful,” states another. “Even if you have none to begin with, you soon become an expert – otherwise you won’t stay in submarines.”

 Another submariner feels that adjustment is no problem because those who are unable to adapt are weeded out before or during their Submarine School indoctrination.

 

WHAT DOES a submariner like most about life aboard a submarines By far the most popular answer to that question is “esprit de corps.”  More specifically, the submariners cited “competent personnel,” “a family atmosphere,” “teamwork,” “working with highly educated people,” “good-natured crews,” “friendly association with other crewmembers,” and “informality.”

 In addition to the informality, the submariners preferred the less rigid adherence to regulations, greater challenges, and more responsibility.

 

 Still others regarded highly such benefits as better food, all-night movies, training programs, and submarine operating schedules. On the opposite side of the scale, the submariners referred to overcrowded living and working conditions and lack of stowage space as what they liked least about their undersea life. Nearly 50% indicated they would be more comfortable if there were enough bunks to go around, more privacy, and greater storage space.

Long patrols, long hours, and personnel shortages rated next on their list of dislikes, followed by the lack of laundry facilities and enough water for daily showers at sea. One submariner volunteered that most of his sub pay is used for laundry expenses, which, he said, puts him in no better financial position than a surface Navyman who receives free laundry services.

Ever since the crew of USS Holland was formed in 1900, sub-mariners have boasted about their food.

 

 Since no survey of submarine personnel would be complete without a query on the subject, an attempt was made to support or refute that long-standing claim. About three-fourths of those questioned upheld the traditional boast. A few were undecided. And a few more said, “It depends.” One replied, “not necessarily,” and one opposed the claim altogether concerning meals in submarines. The affirmative replies were due to a variety of reasons. Some praised the high caliber of food and supply personnel, and their pride in their work. Others reasoned that a smaller crew permitted a more personal touch. Then, too, many approved of the family-style dining atmosphere, as well as the quality and quantity of food. One dolphin-wearer had the final answer. He couldn’t make a comparison, he said, because he had been in submarines so long he had forgotten how it was in other segments of the Navy.

W. J. Thomas, JOC, USN

 

 

 

Giveaway Shared: Dog Gone It

Originally posted on: Dogs with a Cause

I am going to pass this wonderful opportunity along to anyone who happens to stop by.  While I was cruising around Facebook my wife sidetracked me, directing me to the Dog Gone It fan page.  It would appear that they have a Christmas Collar GIVEAWAY, and although I would very much like to find out that I have won, I would be remiss if I did not pass this opportunity along to everyone else.  Without further ado, may I introduce you to a few of the Dog Gone It collars.

Dog Gone It collars

Go ahead, visit the page and give them a “Like”.  And with that done, stop by the Giveaway tab and enter to win.  Then check out your other methods of entering and if you feel so inclined…you get the general idea.  Anyone can enter!  No purchase is necessary!!

Thank you for taking a moment of your day to read this.  I will begin posting to this site more often.  The service dog trainer reference database is a work in progress and will start locally and then grow outward.  In the meantime, please share the site with friends, family and anyone else you think might be interested. Continue reading